Beta Testers Required

[admin]

New tools added - Schema Microdata Generators.

 

[ogah]

New tools added - Schema Microdata Generators.

please add more, like musicrecording, webapplication, softwareapplication, etc.

 

[admin]

New tools added - Schema Microdata Generators.

please add more, like musicrecording, webapplication, softwareapplication, etc.

Those are not really web development applications. We will be adding more tools soon though.

 

[ogah]

New tools added - Schema Microdata Generators.

please add more, like musicrecording, webapplication, softwareapplication, etc.

Those are not really web development applications. We will be adding more tools soon though.

i mean schema for musicrecording etc.
how about schema webpage and blogposting?

 

[Briar Spirit]

That resource page is pretty cool, haven't had time to really look around much but doing the speed test on my site was fun to do, mind you I have no idea if the results were good or bad.

I got these results:

Attempting a full download of http://www.briarspirit.gi9.co/index.html from local server...

[1] Downloaded webpage in 0.0013 seconds.
[2] Downloaded webpage in 0.0006 seconds.
[3] Downloaded webpage in 0.0006 seconds.
[4] Downloaded webpage in 0.0005 seconds.
[5] Downloaded webpage in 0.0005 seconds.

Attempting a full download of http://www.briarspirit.gi9.co/index.html from remote server...

[1] Downloaded webpage in 1.34 seconds.
[2] Downloaded webpage in 1.3 seconds.
[3] Downloaded webpage in 1.21 seconds.
[4] Downloaded webpage in 0.45 seconds.
[5] Downloaded webpage in 0.67 seconds.

Download completed.

Is that a good or bad result!?

Any chance of there being a grading system to let the user know if their result is good or bad, probably me talking out of my hat with silly suggestions but the result meant nothing to me, no doubt means something to most folk but for us lesser mortals a result grading woud be a fun addition, yeah, I know the resources are not meant to be fun but hey, can't hurt right!

 

[ogah]

That resource page is pretty cool, haven't had time to really look around much but doing the speed test on my site was fun to do, mind you I have no idea if the results were good or bad.

I got these results:

Attempting a full download of http://www.briarspirit.gi9.co/index.html from local server...

[1] Downloaded webpage in 0.0013 seconds.
[2] Downloaded webpage in 0.0006 seconds.
[3] Downloaded webpage in 0.0006 seconds.
[4] Downloaded webpage in 0.0005 seconds.
[5] Downloaded webpage in 0.0005 seconds.

Attempting a full download of http://www.briarspirit.gi9.co/index.html from remote server...

[1] Downloaded webpage in 1.34 seconds.
[2] Downloaded webpage in 1.3 seconds.
[3] Downloaded webpage in 1.21 seconds.
[4] Downloaded webpage in 0.45 seconds.
[5] Downloaded webpage in 0.67 seconds.

Download completed.

Is that a good or bad result!?

Any chance of there being a grading system to let the user know if their result is good or bad, probably me talking out of my hat with silly suggestions but the result meant nothing to me, no doubt means something to most folk but for us lesser mortals a result grading woud be a fun addition, yeah, I know the resources are not meant to be fun but hey, can't hurt right!

for better result performance of your website and how to fix if your web grade not good, test with gtmetrix.com

 

[jaran]

Copyscape detection tool

 

[admin]

Copyscape detection tool

Copyscape do not provide external checking tools.

 

[dxverm]

Hey this is a really great thing for GigaRank! I really like all the useful tools you found and implemented in this section Chris! I found out I have 479 backlinks to my website! That's ridiculous!! Good work Chris!!

 

[admin]

Thanks, we will be adding lots more in the coming months ahead, starting with a templates section.