How To Get Free BiTcoin?

Anehco

New member
Each of the sites below allows you to earn free bitcoin: some by viewing ads, some by answering captcha challenges, and some by doing crowdsourced work. If you're looking to earn some free bitcoin, you came to the right place.

1. Earn Up To 0.015 mBTC Per Click - bit.ly/1bjOwLe
2. Earn 250 uBTC every hour - bit.ly/1fB8JRb
3. Get 0.1 signup bonus - bit.ly/1dY9TkQ
4. Earn more BTC by viewing ads - bit.ly/1imGnLb
5. Free BTC by viewing Ads - bit.ly/1bjOjYj

Thanks :D
 

dxverm

New member
I have tried some of these as well, they do work. You can also search google for BitCoin faucets and earn so much every hour for filling out a Captcha and submitting your email. Earned about 0.005 btc so far for about 2 days of work.
 
That alot of work just to get 1/4 of a cent. You want it faster and to make more, look up bitcoin mining. Find an old computer and set it up and use the CPU to generate the money. Its faster and less work involved.
 

slibinas

New member
strokerace said:
That alot of work just to get 1/4 of a cent. You want it faster and to make more, look up bitcoin mining. Find an old computer and set it up and use the CPU to generate the money. Its faster and less work involved.

i try with old computer, but its very hard to mine because i have old cpu, but with my new computer i try mine with GPU, but anyway very slow mine. i dont know why. My CPU: Intel Core i7-4770K CPU 3.50GHz
 
slibinas said:
strokerace said:
That alot of work just to get 1/4 of a cent. You want it faster and to make more, look up bitcoin mining. Find an old computer and set it up and use the CPU to generate the money. Its faster and less work involved.

i try with old computer, but its very hard to mine because i have old cpu, but with my new computer i try mine with GPU, but anyway very slow mine. i dont know why. My CPU: Intel Core i7-4770K CPU 3.50GHz

Its because you don't have a real 3.5ghz cpu. If its a dual core or quad core, divide it by that number that and that is your real CPU power. But even then, all of these tricks to get free bitcoins are slow. It could take you a long time to make even a dollar. You waste more time then the money you make.
 

slibinas

New member
strokerace said:
slibinas said:
strokerace said:
That alot of work just to get 1/4 of a cent. You want it faster and to make more, look up bitcoin mining. Find an old computer and set it up and use the CPU to generate the money. Its faster and less work involved.

i try with old computer, but its very hard to mine because i have old cpu, but with my new computer i try mine with GPU, but anyway very slow mine. i dont know why. My CPU: Intel Core i7-4770K CPU 3.50GHz

Its because you don't have a real 3.5ghz cpu. If its a dual core or quad core, divide it by that number that and that is your real CPU power. But even then, all of these tricks to get free bitcoins are slow. It could take you a long time to make even a dollar. You waste more time then the money you make.

How to know, how much my cpu have core? I understand this thing. I not computer specialist, my cpu have 7 core or i lying.
 
slibinas said:
strokerace said:
slibinas said:
strokerace said:
That alot of work just to get 1/4 of a cent. You want it faster and to make more, look up bitcoin mining. Find an old computer and set it up and use the CPU to generate the money. Its faster and less work involved.

i try with old computer, but its very hard to mine because i have old cpu, but with my new computer i try mine with GPU, but anyway very slow mine. i dont know why. My CPU: Intel Core i7-4770K CPU 3.50GHz

Its because you don't have a real 3.5ghz cpu. If its a dual core or quad core, divide it by that number that and that is your real CPU power. But even then, all of these tricks to get free bitcoins are slow. It could take you a long time to make even a dollar. You waste more time then the money you make.

How to know, how much my cpu have core? I understand this thing. I not computer specialist, my cpu have 7 core or i lying.

You can find it in the system information. If you are using windows 7, go to control panel and then click on system.
 

smalpierre

New member
Wrong on the clock speed once again ... You do not divide by number of processors, nor do you multiply clock speed x number of processors to get "speed". Go take some digital systems engineering classes Stroke ... Clock speed is how fast the switches turn on and off, and it is an absolute no matter how many processors you have, the clock speed is what it is - and you DO have multiple processors on the system - but the software cannot UTILIZE them being a single threaded application.

The clock is basically a 555 timer. It sends a frequency that the components operate on. You sent it a frequency and the logic gates operate at that speed. Multi core processors are no different.

Google Chrome might take advantage of multiple processes - do a ctl alt del and see how many processes it has open? That's potentially how many cores it can utilize. Still, there are shared resources that the processors will compete for, so even if you have 4 threads and 4 processors it won't be as fast as each thread running on it's own system.

Bitcoin mining will be done in a single thread, I DOUBT it's multithreaded, so you're only using ONE core at 3.5ghz.

They have ASICs just for bitcoin mining (Application Specific Integrated Circuit) - and hardware is always faster than software, usually by a LONNNG shot.

Mining is based on scarecity - so when you're competing with a world full of ASICs, you're not going to be able to compete as efficiently with software running on a general purpose processor. Maybe a GPU would be better suited? I'm not sure about the math involved, but an ASIC will still blow it away and use less power in the process.

I was talking to a guy that claimed he was making between 40 and 200 USD / month with a rapsberry pi, but he was mining obscure cryptocoin, I don't think it was bitcoin.


555 timer - sends a frequency (mhz, ghz - whatever). IC's turn their switchy bits on and off at that speed - PERIOD. I don't care if the system has 100 processors, or 1000, or 1 - they switch at the speed of the clock.
 

smalpierre

New member
I know how they work under the hood. None of that is marketing hype - I leave that for the java junkies and .nettards.


where are your supporting references?


Prove me wrong. I hope you do - I'll have learned something new today.


toms hardware has been around since the 90s for a reason. Stackoverflow - I don't have to tell anybody about them.
 
smalpierre said:
I know how they work under the hood. None of that is marketing hype - I leave that for the java junkies and .nettards.


where are your supporting references?


Prove me wrong. I hope you do - I'll have learned something new today.


toms hardware has been around since the 90s for a reason. Stackoverflow - I don't have to tell anybody about them.





Stackflow is filled with a bunch of wantabe coders and idiots. Toms hardware, well he is not always correct.

I will prove it to you in the easiest way their is. Take 2 computers. One a p4 with a 3.0ghz cpu with 4 gigs of ram. The find a i5 ori7 with a 3.0 ghz cpu. and 4 gigs of ram. Install windows XP on them. Install some heavy programs like Photoshop etc. Then tell me what one loads faster and can perform. I bet the i5/i7 will be slow and not be able to keep up with the p4. The p4 will be running at the 3.0 ghz while the i5/i7 will be running the program at 750meghz
 

smalpierre

New member
Sure - stackoverflow has some wannabe coders - but every one of them is saying the same thing. Every ... single .. one ... Same on Toms, and same everywhere else.

That isn't a valid test of clock speed by any stretch of the imagination. Before multiple processors, the Motorola PowerPC G4 400mHz can run a p4 750mhz into the ground. Doesn't mean that 400mhz is a higher clock frequency than 750mhz. "heavy" programs aren't necessarily multi threaded - so it'll only be using the 1 core. All other things being equal, the multicore could be slower, since there are other processes however minute running - things that will create resource sharing conflicts that it will have to resolve - via a backoff/retry or whatever. Still, they're not equal. The I7 is a more efficient processor, and would keep up just fine with a P4 of the same rating. It will however blow its doors off when you start running it as a webserver, or a database server handling a lot of concurrent connections.

I've seen a 2.0L eclipse that blows the doors off of 5.7L camaros - a car with almost 3 times the engine size that doesn't weigh much more. So how fast a car is in a given scenario isn't going to determine which has the bigger motor - same thing with computers.

http://ark.intel.com/products/87718/Intel-Core-i7-5775R-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_80-GHz

So Intel - they must be full of idiots too - or they just don't know much about their processors?
 
Man, trust me, I am into electronics. I have read all the data sheets, spec etc and with my knowledge of chips, it doesn't work. Its impossible to do. What you are saying and the way they claim it works, It would mean its 4 cpu's in one. That is how its explain and describe. If that was true, why didn't they come out with 3.8ghz day one? You know why, they can't figure out how to make 4 chips work as one. So, the way this one works, the ghz is spread over 2 or 4 with it being half ghz or 1/4 ghz in each core. Math tells me that, logic tells me that and actually working data tells me that. Even the guys who sell the chips told me the same thing when I questioned them. Other then them going to 64bit programming, they are not what they are being advertised as. Also, if the technology was as it was describe, why are these chips so cheap? They are as cheap or cheaper then a single core chip. Example is the ram, DDR3 was more then DDR2 ram. Now, DDR2 is more expensive then DDR3. They use terminology to confuse people, smoke and mirror stuff. The only benefit you have with the newer chips is, they went to 64bit programming Thus making the code bigger and bulky. Thats it