I've been using Malwarebytes for the last year - the free version. Alongside my Kaspersky. I've had a very positive experience with the free version. Although my Kaspersky is on a regular schedule of scanning, I do a Malwarebytes thorough scan about once a month or in six weeks. Usually I have a clean scan but with my last scan Malwarebytes found a Trojan infection:
PUP.optional.superoptimzer.c
Not sure how I got it but what then intrigued me was that Malwarebytes says it is OK to keep the infection quarantined without needing to delete it. Apparently the philosophy behind it is that it could be a false positive and if deleted when it's from the registry could create some bad malfunctions if it was a false positive. With the quarantine one gets a second chance to restore it. Only need to delete it is when there are too many infections in the quarantine. So I'm following the advice and going for the quarantine only for now but wonder what others do when they are given this choice - i.e. quarantine or delete?
What also worries me is when I was checking through the Malwarebytes help forums last night, I noticed Malwarebytes friendly staff guiding those who want to delete their trojans and advising them that the script they provide is only applicable to their specific specifications. I.e. any other way of deleting could potentially be harmful to their computer system. That also made me hesitate to delete the infection on my system last night. Better to keep it quarantined and then if I reformat the hard disk maybe in a year or two from now it would die a natural death? Or did Malwarebytes when it quarantined my infection already got it organized that if I hit the delete button that there would not be any harm done to my registry? Not sure how to trust any software that fiddles with my computer registry - either the trojan or the anti-trojan script?
PUP.optional.superoptimzer.c
Not sure how I got it but what then intrigued me was that Malwarebytes says it is OK to keep the infection quarantined without needing to delete it. Apparently the philosophy behind it is that it could be a false positive and if deleted when it's from the registry could create some bad malfunctions if it was a false positive. With the quarantine one gets a second chance to restore it. Only need to delete it is when there are too many infections in the quarantine. So I'm following the advice and going for the quarantine only for now but wonder what others do when they are given this choice - i.e. quarantine or delete?
What also worries me is when I was checking through the Malwarebytes help forums last night, I noticed Malwarebytes friendly staff guiding those who want to delete their trojans and advising them that the script they provide is only applicable to their specific specifications. I.e. any other way of deleting could potentially be harmful to their computer system. That also made me hesitate to delete the infection on my system last night. Better to keep it quarantined and then if I reformat the hard disk maybe in a year or two from now it would die a natural death? Or did Malwarebytes when it quarantined my infection already got it organized that if I hit the delete button that there would not be any harm done to my registry? Not sure how to trust any software that fiddles with my computer registry - either the trojan or the anti-trojan script?